Which configuration changes can deny Webserver access for Remote-User2 while allowing access for Remote-User1?

The option to enable match-vip in the Deny policy is correct because it allows for the creation of a more precise control mechanism that can distinguish between users attempting to access the same resource. By enabling match-vip, you can tailor the firewall rule to specifically target Remote-User2 while allowing Remote-User1 unrestricted access to the Webserver. This is valuable in scenarios where different access privileges are required based on specific user identities or attributes.

In this context, the Deny policy needs to utilize the match-vip feature effectively to ensure that Remote-User2's requests to the Webserver are blocked based on their virtual IP match, while those of Remote-User1 can proceed if they meet the criteria defined under the allow policies.

Other options would not effectively achieve the goal of blocking access exclusively for Remote-User2 while keeping it open for Remote-User1. For instance, setting the Destination address as the Webserver in the Deny policy might affect all users, not just Remote-User2, unless additional conditions are specified. More stringent firewall rules for Remote-User1 might inadvertently restrict access for all users or not affect Remote-User2 at all, thereby not solving the initial requirement. Lastly, setting the action type to Log